Win-win
"Finding Money for Health Care Reform — Rooting Out Waste, Fraud, and Abuse", John K. Iglehart link
"A Win–Win Approach to Financing Health Care Reform", Jonathan Gruber, Ph.D. economista do "Massachusetts Institute of Technology", um dos arquitectos do plano de reforma. link
Here's his description of win-win:
I prefer to view this as a progressive tax increase, with 62% of the revenues raised from families with annual incomes of more than $100,000. Yet there would still be a sizeable increase in taxation for middle-income families, with 10% of revenues coming from families with annual incomes below $50,000 and 28% from those with annual incomes of $50,000 to $100,000. For this reason, and because not all the revenues to be gained by removing the exclusion would be needed to finance reform, we should reduce, rather than remove, the exclusion.
I prefer to view this as a progressive tax increase, with 62% of the revenues raised from families with annual incomes of more than $100,000. Yet there would still be a sizeable increase in taxation for middle-income families, with 10% of revenues coming from families with annual incomes below $50,000 and 28% from those with annual incomes of $50,000 to $100,000. For this reason, and because not all the revenues to be gained by removing the exclusion would be needed to finance reform, we should reduce, rather than remove, the exclusion.
Etiquetas: USA health 2
0 Comments:
Enviar um comentário
<< Home